His lawyers, led by Medard Lubega Sseggona filed the application this morning asking leave of court to withdrawal the petition in whole. Kyagulanyi lists six reasons for withdrawing the petition, which are also supported with arguments in an affidavit of 22 paragraphs.
The former
National Unity Platform-NUP Party presidential candidate Robert Kyagulanyi
Ssentamu has formally applied to the Supreme Court asking to withdraw
his presidential election petition.
His lawyers, led by Medard Lubega Sseggona filed the application
this morning asking leave to withdraw the petition as a whole.
Kyagulanyi lists
six reasons for withdrawing the petition that are supported with
arguments in an affidavit of 22 paragraphs. According to Kyagulanyi, his witnesses
are being abducted, tortured, harassed, and intimidated by state security
operatives at the watch of President, Yoweri Kaguta Museveni, and Attorney
General, the first and third respondents to the presidential elections petition
respectively.
He also argues that the organs of the state like the Uganda Police Force and
National Identification of Registrations of Persons Authority -NIRA, are being used
by the respondents to investigate and infringe on his privacy and that of his
witnesses. The musician turned politician also alleges that the court has
applied the rules governing the Presidential Election Petitions to his
disadvantage. He cites the court's decision rejecting his application to amending
his pleadings.
"The petitioner's application for extension of time for
filing of additional affidavits was disallowed thus frustrating effective
Prosecution of the petition” reads the application. On February 11th, 2021, a panel of nine Supreme Court
Justices led by the Chief Justice Alfonse Owiny-Dollo granted Kyagulanyi
permission to bring additional affidavits not later than February 14
2021. But Kyagulanyi, who wanted to bring about 200 affidavits, failed to
meet the deadline citing unusual circumstances.
He said the unusual
circumstances included the fact that his lawyers were operating
mobile law firms due to insecurity and fear that state operatives may steal the evidence
like the case was during the Amama Mbabazi Presidential Election Petition in
2016.
He also argued that state operatives seized their political
party offices under the command of Museveni and the Attorney General's agents,
which made it difficult for him to file relevant affidavits and evidence in
support of his petition on time.
"The Petitioner lost time during the illegal house detention. But this honourable court is more inclined towards the strict timelines, which has
disadvantaged the petitioner to the advantage of the respondents",
reads the application in part. In his affidavit supporting the application,
Kyagulanyi's says the decision to withdraw the Petition has been
influenced by the foregoing factors and not by any corrupt bargain or
consideration from the respondents or any other person.
According to Section 20 Subsection 3 of the Presidential Elections Act,
"an application for leave to withdraw a petition shall be supported by an
affidavit of the Petitioner and his or her advocate, if any stating to the best
of their knowledge and belief that no agreement or terms or of any kind have been made or undertaking made in relation to the petition or, if any
lawful agreement has been made, stating the terms of the agreement."
Kyagulanyi’s application is supported by his own affidavit. The
same laws also state that if the petition is withdrawn, the petitioner shall be
liable to pay costs to the respondent. The Supreme Court had earlier on scheduled
the conferencing for Kyagulanyi’s main presidential election petition today. It's
unclear whether or not the conferencing will proceed with the new development.
Ssegona confirmed the submission of their application to
formally withdraw the petition. But declined to divulge details.
//Cue In: “Yes it…..
Cue Out:……hear them,”//
Luganda Audio
//Cue In: “Tutaddeyo…….
Cue Out:.. Kukirizza,”//
The rules governing the presidential election petitions
allow the court to substitute a petitioner once he loses interest. Unconfirmed reports
indicate that former presidential candidate, John Katumba may take on the petition. Katumba could neither confirm nor deny the allegation, saying he is still studying the situation to inform his next move.
He promised to meet with our reporter to explain his position and next move. Kyagulanyi ran to the Supreme Court challenging the election of the president,
Museveni saying the entire electoral process was marred by several illegalities
such as voter bribery, intimidation, favouritism, and arrests of his supporters
among others.