They told the court to disregard Kwoyelo’s defence alibi, find him guilty as charged and convict him accordingly on the 69 counts that relate to murder, kidnapping with intent to murder, pillaging, aggravated robbery, cruel treatment, enslavement, torture, rape, and outrages upon personal dignity.
Assessors render their opinion before the trial panel at International Crimes Division at Gulu High Court Circuit on August 2 2024.
Court assessors have asked Judges
at the International Crimes Division of the High Court to convict former Lord’s
Resistance Army rebel commander Thomas Kwoyelo alias Latoni over alleged war crimes and crimes
against humanity.
Three assessors offered their opinions
to the trial panel on Friday at the Gulu High Court circuit, a week
after the court summed up all the laws and evidence in the case of Kwoyelo to them.
The assessors, Franklin Odongkara, Daniel Ocen and Nighty Ajok have been taking
part in the trial of Kwoyelo since their appointment in March 2019.
Kwoyelo is facing 78 counts of
war crimes and crimes against humanity allegedly committed between 1993 and
2005 in Kilak County in Present Day Amuru District.
However, while rendering their opinions
to the court, the assessors said they were convinced the prosecution had
adduced enough evidence in 69 counts of charges against the suspect.
They told the court to disregard Kwoyelo’s
defence alibi, find him guilty as charged and convict him accordingly on
the 69 counts that relate to murder, kidnapping with intent to murder,
pillaging, aggravated robbery, cruel treatment, enslavement, torture, rape, and
outrages upon personal dignity.
The assessors however told the
court that the suspect should be acquitted of nine counts of charges citing
there wasn’t enough evidence adduced by the prosecution to pin Kwoyelo against
the charges.
For instance, assessor Franklin
Odongakara told the Judges that counts 2 and 87 relating to murder and violence
to life and person as a violation of Article 3 (1) (a) Common to The Geneva
Conventions under customary international law be dropped.
He reasoned that in count 2, the
victim who was reportedly killed was a government collaborator while in count
87, not all elements of rape were proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
“We therefore advise this court,
to find the accused not guilty and acquit him on this count as charged. This is
our opinion my lords” said Odongkara.
In counts 85, and 84
relating to Torture and rape as a crime against humanity under customary
international law, assessor Daniel Ocen asked the judges to equally drop the
charges citing there wasn’t substantial evidence proved beyond reasonable doubt
by the prosecution.
Assessor Nighty Ajok, in her
opinion however noted that Kwoyelo should be acquitted on counts 52, 24, 23, and
17 relating to murder were contrary to sections 188 and 189 of The Penal Code
Act and count 88 of rape contrary to sections 123 & 124 of the penal code
act.
According to Ajok, the ingredients in the counts were not proved beyond
reasonable doubt by the prosecution who asked the court not to find the accused
guilty of the charges arguing that he should accordingly be acquitted.
A total of 53 prosecution witnesses
were presented in the case to pin Kwoyelo who only presented four defence
witnesses in April 2024.
Juliet Harty Hatanga, the Deputy
Registrar of the International Crimes Division of the High Court told Uganda
Radio Network on Friday that the assessor's opinions reflect the ordinary person's
perspective on the case.
She says the opinion of the
assessors may have a bearing on the judgement but notes that judges are not
obliged to entirely follow it since the assessors aren’t legal experts.
“The judges’ opinions could differ
from that of the assessors, or they could also agree. But the judges have a heightened
responsibility to give a critical analysis of the evidence of exhibits because
they put their legal minds on the matter,” says Hatanga.
Justice Michael Elubu on Friday
adjourned the court until August 13 when the matter returns for final
judgement. Other judges in the case are Justice Stephen Mubiru, Duncan Gaswaga,
and Alternate Judge Andrew Bashaija.
About Kwoyelo trial
The prosecution alleges that
between 1987 and 2005, the accused was at all material times a member of the
LRA, an organized armed faction that engaged in fighting the Government of the
Republic of Uganda. They alleged he held several command positions, and that
due to his participation in numerous LRA operations, the accused was always in the
know of the factual circumstances that culminated in the existence of this non-international
armed conflict.
For instance, between 1992 and
2005, the prosecution alleged Kwoyelo was a military commander in the LRA and held
several positions including commander of Operations, Director of Military Intelligence
and in charge of all Sick Bays.
They contend that most of the time during his
operations, the accused was based in Kilak Hills located in the present-day
Amuru District adding that his areas of operation covered the whole of Kilak
County and in these areas, he was a subordinate only to the overall leader of
the LRA, Joseph Kony.
Kwoyelo was captured by the
Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) soldiers in the Garamba National Park in
the Democratic Republic of Congo in March 2009 and was subsequently brought to
Uganda and detained at Upper Prison Luzira.
His trial commenced on November
12, 2018, in the High Court sitting in Gulu. Kwoyelo was initially indicted of 93
counts but on December 18, 2023, the trial panel found that he had a case to
answer in respect to 78 counts and was consequently acquitted of 15 counts.
Bureau Chief, West Acholi