In September, a section of Masaka City Councillor embarked on the process to impeach Ssempijja, accusing him of tampering with official court records, highhandedness while executing his duties, misusing his authority to mistreat councilors, exerting undue dominance over them and neglecting his parental responsibility.
The Masaka City Council Speaker Tony Ssempijja who is facing Censor by councilors
Masaka High Court has rejected an application seeking to block the planned censure of Tony Ssempijja, the Speaker of Masaka City Council.
In September, a section of Masaka City Councillor embarked
on the process to impeach Ssempijja, accusing him of tampering with official
court records, highhandedness while executing his duties, misusing his
authority to mistreat councilors, exerting undue dominance over them and
neglecting his parental responsibility.
The councilors petitioned the Ministry of Local
Government Raphael Magyezi, notifying him of their intention to pass a vote of no confidence
against the Speaker.
However, Ssempijja through his lawyers; of Mbabali Jude and
Company Advocates ran the court and applied for an injunction against his
censure, alleging that it was a plot conceived out of malice and falsehoods for
which he was not accorded a fair hearing.
He requested the court to issue an order restraining the Minister
for Local Government from presiding over a council in session in Masaka city
and allowing a debate on the censure motion.
He also alleges that the planned censure contravened the set
laws, arguing that instead of the petitioner seeking an audience with the Minister
of Local Government to substantiate their grounds, it was the Mayor calling the
Minister to preside over the debate on the censure motion.
However, the Masaka High Court Registrar Julius Borore, has dismissed
the application, indicating that the applicant was attempting to move court to
interfere with the responsibilities of the Minister of Local Government.
Borore argued that the Minister of Local
Government as a legal superintendent has the authority to intervene, probe, and
make decisions regarding any complaints brought to his attention, and the court
could not block him from performing his constitutional responsibilities.
“The alleged censure motion is yet to be debated and considered,
therefore court finds it difficult to issue orders about a decision that has not
yet been taken,” the ruling indicates part, adding that the council is free to continue
to transact business and to allow an opportunity of fair hearing to the applicant.
Zahara Nalubyayi, the Masaka City Female Councilor
representing the Kimanya-Kabonera division, who was among the team that petitioned
the Minister, has received the ruling as a remedy to the confusion that affects
the Masaka City Council.
According to Nalubyayi, they have repeatedly been calling their
Speaker to order but he has deliberately remained indifferent, which cast the council
in public disrepute, something that prompted them to consider impeaching her.
Nalubyayi indicates that prior to initiating the censure, the council
attempted to institute a special committee to probe the allegations, but the
Speaker frustrated all the efforts, hence referring the matter to the Minister
as the supervisor.
However, Ssempijja indicates that he is not moved by the dismissal
of his application, warning that should the Minister go ahead to preside over a
debate of his censure, he will file a main suit against him and Masaka City
Council.
He argues that besides basing on falsehoods, the councils are
basing their decisions on the wrong sections of the law.
The Local
Government Act provides that a Speaker or Deputy Speaker can be removed from
office by a resolution supported by not less than two-thirds of the council
members, based on grounds of abuse of office, incompetence, misconduct, or
misbehavior.
But Ssempijja through his lawyer also argues that such provisions are yet to be
gazetted as laws to be applied in the newly created City Council.