Proponents argue that because nuclear energy does not require burning fossil fuels, it does not directly contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change — which has led some to say that it could make the energy transition more feasible.
The
International Conference on Nuclear Security (ICONS 2024)
opens on Monday as countries ponder how to shift away from fossil fuels. Countries
were in the past reluctant to discuss the role of nuclear energy technology in
the Energy transition.
Energy
transition refers to the global energy sector’s shift from fossil-based systems
of energy production and consumption — including oil, natural gas, and coal —
to renewable energy sources like wind solar, and lithium-ion batteries.
The
suggestion to have nuclear, as part of renewable energy sources has always
generated debate. However, at the UN Climate Change in Dubai countries called
for accelerating the deployment of low-emission technologies including nuclear
energy to help achieve deep and rapid decarbonization.
Decarbonization
is the process of cutting or eliminating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by
phasing out the use of fossil fuels and switching to renewable sources of
energy like solar, wind, geothermal, hydroelectricity, and recently nuclear.
Governments
around the world are urgently seeking to decarbonize their economies whilst
ensuring the security of energy supply. As a low-carbon electricity source,
nuclear energy can contribute to clean energy capacity and emissions reductions
between 2020 and 2050.
However,
concerns about nuclear power’s safety and cost have clouded the technology’s
role in the transition to clean energy. Some of those concerns are part of the ICONS
2024 agenda.
The
time has come for Nuclear Energy
For
supporters of nuclear energy, COP28 marked a watershed moment because it was
the first time that countries including Uganda recognized the need to
accelerate it among the low-emission technologies. Twenty-five countries
pledged to triple nuclear power by 2050.
A recent high-level conference on nuclear
energy signaled a change in the political landscape about nuclear and energy transitions.
“I
remember the days when you could not have simple conversations about nuclear
energy at international energy conversations. People didn’t just want to talk
about it. Even countries that were highly reliant on nuclear didn’t want to talk
about it. That shows you how things have changed said Nuclear
Energy Agency Director-General William D. Magwood IV.
William
D. Magwood spoke at a virtual
event hosted by the Atlantic Council as part of the event to mark Planet Week on
28th April this year.
Magwood discussed how nuclear
energy is experiencing a resurgence due to the research that shows that nuclear
energy is an essential part of the energy mix if countries want to meet net-zero
goals by 2050.
"Many
NEA member and non-member countries are taking substantial action to invest in
new nuclear reactors and new technologies because nuclear energy has the
ability to ensure energy security, mitigate climate change, and drive economic
development,” he said.
He expressed
optimism about nuclear energy's potential to shape a sustainable future.
“Nuclear
energy has this window of opportunity to make a positive difference for the
future," said William D. Magwood IV.
Why
Nuclear in Energy Transition?
Proponents argue that because nuclear energy does not require burning fossil
fuels, it does not directly contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and climate
change — which has led some to say that it could make the energy transition
more feasible.
It
has been found that while advancements in renewable energy sources like solar
and wind are significant, the infrastructure and market aren't fully prepared
to abandon fossil fuels immediately.
That is why countries at COP28 said there
is a need for bridge solutions, such as natural gas and nuclear power, to
ensure energy security and economic stability during the clean energy
transition.
State
of global Nuclear energy deployment
There
are currently 393 gigawatts of nuclear energy around the world, making up 10%
of the world’s electricity. That supply is coming from 444 nuclear energy
reactors operating in thirty countries around the world.
The
Nuclear Energy Deficit
The
United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recently released what
it called the 90 Pathways to Net Zero.
It said the world needs one thousand one
hundred and sixty gigawatts by 2050 to contain climate change to less than 1.5
degrees Celsius. Other studies have said the global nuclear capacity needs to
triple in the next three decades and that the world is not about to meet those
targets.
Reaching net zero will require clean electricity and clean fuels. Proponents
of nuclear energy suggest that it provides both. That it provides reliable,
dispatchable, and non-emitting electricity and baseload load electricity.
With
a wave of innovations like Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and nuclear-produced
hydrogen, the nuclear energy sector can do so much more.
Uganda’s ambitions in nuclear energy
Uganda launched its Energy Transition Strategy on the sidelines of COP28 in
Dubai in December 2023.
The
strategy is based on Uganda’s ambitious plan to develop industrialize and meet
the energy security plan as per the new energy policy launched in 2023.
By
2040, Uganda plans to generate about 52000 megawatts of electricity. In real
terms, that means that Uganda today is able to aggregate about 28000 megawatts
excluding nuclear.
“So
we are able to draw all our potential on the hydro side where we still have
4500 megawatts untapped, we have some geothermal about 1550 megawatts, we have
some wind, solar and biomass. But we are able to generate up to 28000
megawatts,” Bateebe revealed.
“So
the shortfall between 52000 megawatts and 28000 megawatts shall be covered by
nuclear 24000 megawatts. I know one will say we are ambitious with nuclear but
that is the reality as we set to decarbonize,” Bateebe observed.
It
appears that Uganda is determined to push further its nuclear ambitions. A team
of experts from the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Integrated
Uranium Production Cycle Review (IUPCR) missions is in Uganda for follow-up.
IUPCR
has been in Uganda several times to advise in the development of infrastructure
for national uranium production programs. Uganda has chosen to take a phased uranium
production cycle.
Engineer
Irene Bateebe told journalists that as part of the efforts to further Uganda’s
expertise in nuclear energy, the Ministry of Energy is collaborating with the
University of Soroti to set a center for nuclear science and technology.
“We
will be able to train Ugandans to understand the aspects of nuclear and be able
to run this nuclear power plant