Breaking

Supreme Court Gives Final Order Reverting Crane Bank to Sudhir

The decision made on Friday by Supreme Court Justice Professor Lillian Tibatemwa Ekirikubinza follows a disagreement that has been on for six months between the Bank of Uganda and Sudhir Ruparelia on whether the final order that needs to be enforced should also reflect that the bank is reverted back to the businessman.
Businessman Sudhir Ruparelia and his Son Rajiv Ruparelia.

Audio 1



City property mogul Sudhir Ruparelia has today obtained a final order of the Supreme Court allowing them to implement its earlier decision to revert the Crane Bank to its shareholders.

The decision made on Friday by Supreme Court Justice Professor Lillian Tibatemwa Ekirikubinza follows a disagreement that has been on for six months between the Bank of Uganda and Sudhir on whether the final order that needs to be enforced should also reflect that the bank is reverted to the businessman.    

This decision arises from an appeal filed by Crane Bank in receivership (Bank of Uganda) on August 1st, 2020 challenging the decision by the Court of Appeal to dismiss the case in which they had accused Sudhir and his company Meera Investments Limited of withdrawing 397 billion shillings from Crane Bank in fraudulent transactions.

   

It all started on June 30th,2017, when Crane Bank in receivership/Bank of Uganda sued Sudhir and his company Meera Investments Limited before the Commercial Division of the High Court seeking to recover the said monies that had reportedly been siphoned by Sudhir. 

  They also sought to recover freehold certificates of title to 48 properties together with duly executed transfer agreements and a refund of the monies for which they claimed were for invalid leases. 

 

However, in 2019, the then Commercial Court Judge David Wangutusi dismissed the case with costs on grounds that the Crane Bank in receivership had no capacity to commence legal proceedings against Sudhir.  

Not happy with the decision of Justice Wangutusi, Crane Bank under receivership challenged Wangutusi's decision in the Court of Appeal citing that the Judge erred in law by holding that the bank had ceased to own property and its liabilities and assets had all been exhausted.

The appeal by the Bank of Uganda was however dismissed with costs leading to an appeal to the Supreme Court. The Bank of Uganda on August 1st, 2020 however withdrew the appeal before it could be heard by the Supreme Court.  But Sudhir together with his company Meera Investments Limited objected to the withdrawal saying that they should be awarded costs.

The Supreme Court agreed with Sudhir and directed Bank of Uganda to pay costs in its February 11th, 2022 decision. The Supreme Court also ruled that receivership of Crane Bank Limited ended on January 20, 2018, and from that date, the management and control of Crane Bank returned to its Shareholders.  

But when Sudhir and his company who were the successful party prepared a decree to be approved by the Court for enforcement of its decision, the Bank of Uganda objected to the format on what the third order should state.

The third order was that "the appellant's receivership ended on 20th January 2018 and thereafter its management reverted to the shareholders.

  Bank of Uganda was not happy with the last part of the order to the effect that ''thereafter its management reverted to the shareholders".

It agreed with the rest of the orders that the appeal be dismissed with costs to be paid by Bank of Uganda and that the dismissal is with effect from February 11th, 2022. But it was not contented with reverting the management of Crane Bank to shareholders.

Bank of Uganda argued that the Supreme Court had no jurisdiction to make an order reverting the management to the shareholders because when they withdrew their case, the contention was on who should pay costs and that the Court of Appeal had not ordered that it should be reverted. 

In her decision on Friday, Justice Lillian Tibatemwa indicated that under the Financial Intelligence Act, after the expiration of 12 months from the date of takeover by the receiver, the receivership must be deemed to have lapsed by operation of the law. 

   

 "It is a position at common law that where a legal relationship is terminated by effluxion of time then the rights accruing revert back to the owner," said Tibatemwa.

She added that Crane Bank existed as a legal entity before it was licensed to operate as a financial institution and that the return of management to the shareholders is a logical result of the fact that the Central Bank is no longer a receiver and no longer the manager.

    As such, the Court has emphasized that the Crane Bank receivership ended on January 20th 2018 and consequently, its management has to be reverted to its shareholders.  

Sudhir’s lawyer Peter Kabatsi has welcomed the decision saying it has been a tough fight.

//Cue in:  "The decision today ...//

Cue out:...hands down."//

Images 1

Keywords