Uganda National Examination Board- UNEB has said that the use of
the random number system has been a success.
Last year, UNEB introduced use of random numbers to identify examination centres
instead of school names. Candidates were also given codes instead of district
The numbers provided by the examination body were enclosed in each
examination pouch and once the pouch was opened, examination officers could
then provide the number to the sitting candidates.
The said numbers, according to UNEB officials, were introduced as one of the
means to increase transparency during the marking of examinations.
Prior to the system, it was rumoured that some schools were
influencing examiners during the marking exercises. There were also several
complaints from parents, more so in Kampala areas, that some schools had been
under marked intentionally.
The UNEB chairperson Mary Okwakol says since the concept was not new at the
examination board having applied it at the Uganda Advanced Certificate of
Education-UACE and Uganda Certificate of Education-UCE, it has been easy for
them to manage despite a few challenges faced in several districts.
//Cue in; “Some schools and…
Cue out…IT directorate.”//
During the examination, URN found out that several candidates, teachers and
supervisors had been confused with some of them using Education Management
Information System-EMIS numbers attached to each school instead of the random
numbers used by the Uganda National Examinations Board.
UNEB executive secretary Daniel Odongo observes that the confusing troubled
their team during the examination days and also after collecting the
examinations. Odongo says that UNEB team went through each examination pouch to
ensure that the right random number had been written on the scripts.
//Cue in: “There were…
Cue out…data base.”//
However, Odongo is optimistic that since the practice was new at the level, a
number of mistakes were expected.
The random number concept was adapted in 2014 with a view of
making it too difficult for an examiner to identify which school they are
assessing thus limiting bias and possible leniency.
Malpractice in national examination remains a big vice with the
examination board working tiresomely to cover all the loose end.
With several interventions, the number of malpractice case per
examination process is dropping.
This year a total of 1,512 PLE Candidates’
results have been withheld on grounds of suspected Malpractice compare to 3,500